From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 8 04:05:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560BE16A4DD for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 04:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao03.cox.net (eastrmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE8443D53 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 04:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060908040532.IGED23863.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:05:32 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([72.200.25.154]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Kg5M1V00n3KVMNG0000000 Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:05:22 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8845UDJ037733; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:05:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:05:25 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20060907230525.202054fb@serene.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.1/gfortran 4.1 on FreeBSD 6/AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:05:34 -0000 On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:43:13 +0200 (CEST), Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Steve, et al, > > the latest snapshot of GCC 4.1 fails to build on FreeBSD 6/AMD64, > according to reports from the FreeBSD ports build cluster: > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=gcc41 > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=gfortran > > Has any of you seen similar problems? > > Would you mind trying to reproduce this by build the lang/gcc41 or > lang/gfortran ports and let me know the result? > > (If that fails, I'd be most interested to see whether this also > reproduces with the current subversion status of the GCC 4.1 branch.) > > Thanks! > Gerald I've had no particular problems building either gcc 4.1 or 4.2, except that the gcj compiler bombs with an error message about a missing "spec" file (I have no idea what such a file is supposed to contain). A pity, really, I use Java quite a bit here, and gcj would be an ultra-cool thing to have. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"