From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 21 05:48:28 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD5016A4E0;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.178])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56CA43D5E;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146])
	by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id
	k7L5mKLX000672; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7L5mCdB014327; 
	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:47:40 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20060821.144740.26469411.chat95@mac.com>
To: dougb@FreeBSD.org
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <44E941BB.7030408@FreeBSD.org>
References: <44E81C12.9050306@FreeBSD.org>
	<20060821.103329.34694587.chat95@mac.com>
	<44E941BB.7030408@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: private
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k=
X-Language-Identified: TRUE
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, maho@FreeBSD.org, infofarmer@FreeBSD.org,
	portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Enforcing "DIST_SUBDIR/DISTFILE" uniqueness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:48:28 -0000

In Message-ID: <44E941BB.7030408@FreeBSD.org> 
Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> NAKATA Maho wrote:
> > In Message-ID: <44E81C12.9050306@FreeBSD.org> 
> > Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> I recently added logic to portmaster to handle this kind of situation
> >> transparently for the user. A more general solution to this part of the
> >> problem could be had by improving the logic in the 'make checksum' target.
> >> OTOH, your solution would break the logic that portmaster (and I believe
> >> portupgrade also) uses to detect and delete stale distfiles.
> > 
> > It seems that I should not say something about such kind of issue.
> 
> Why not? You certainly won't offend me. :)

I thought that such kind of political issue must be handeled by portmgr,
and IMHO original idea, retaining DISTFILE uniqueness is a good one.
and I'm not violating the rule of FreeBSD ports system, since I
sufficiently explained at commit log.
But I don't want to implement this :)

thanks,
-- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)