From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 12 19:14:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp3.knology.net (user-24-214-63-13.knology.net [24.214.63.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 439E637B403 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:14:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@havk.org) Received: (qmail 25475 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 02:14:27 -0000 Received: from user-24-214-56-224.knology.net (HELO bsd.havk.org) (24.214.56.224) by user-24-214-63-13.knology.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2001 02:14:27 -0000 Received: by bsd.havk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F0DE31A7D1; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:13:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:13:56 -0500 From: Steve Price To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out a fiew tuning options) Message-ID: <20010712211356.D75539@bsd.havk.org> References: <200107130205.f6D250Y136048@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200107130205.f6D250Y136048@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:05:00PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:05:00PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > It's bad enough that a tuned FreeBSD box still collapses under load, > while the untuned Linux box doesn't. [snip] Is this a troll?! In my experience the exact opposite is true. Of course YMMV depending on your "religious" views. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message