Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:40:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204494] [PATCH] sysutils/mdf2iso: mark UN'BROKEN (fetchable) Message-ID: <bug-204494-13-dQBNtkQvr5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |koobs@FreeBSD.org Keywords|patch-ready | --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- @Matthew / @Chris, thank you both for submitting changes to rescue this port. Can you organise/decide among yourselves which patch should be committed. Since this port has no maintainer, both changes 'technically' have implicit approval, so I'm going to reset the flag until you've both decided and provide instructions. 1) Whichever way we go, we should have redundant MASTER_SITES and a 'non-fork' situation. Where did version 3.1 come from? 2) Regarding the merge (MFH) to quarterly, a separate changeset should be attached just for the fix (if it applied to the latest quarterly), as version updates don't go there (which I'm still unsure about) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204494-13-dQBNtkQvr5>