From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 18 11:02:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8122C1065670 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5543C8FC14 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8526 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2009 11:02:17 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Mar 2009 11:02:17 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC345084B for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:02:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 222AF1CDFA; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:02:13 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <25F15A6A-6A95-4500-9831-9021A5102450@charter.net> <20090317191354.4c98b2de@sbcglobal.net> <49C040C9.3090107@ibctech.ca> <89C4FE48-2536-44A9-B777-F82F03A92FC9@charter.net> <49C05103.2000709@ibctech.ca> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:02:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Charles Howse's message of "Tue\, 17 Mar 2009 20\:55\:27 -0500") Message-ID: <447i2n3xhn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Physical location of cvsup servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:02:18 -0000 Charles Howse writes: > Mainly, it's curiosity. I know-fer-a-fact I saw a list of physical > locations back when 4.x was the latest release. Probably been > deleted. Certainly wouldn't be accurate any more. The server CNAMEs get shifted around from time to time, generally when the machine hosting one gets retired. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/