Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:48:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221149] mail/postfix-policyd-weight: rc script name issues when used with py27-salt-2016.11.5 Message-ID: <bug-221149-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221149 Bug ID: 221149 Summary: mail/postfix-policyd-weight: rc script name issues when used with py27-salt-2016.11.5 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com Hi, I ran into a bug (which might be related to a previous bug from policyd-weight), at least in 2017Q3 branch that I am using. Namely it breaks the saltstack "enable" service due to the way it does the lookup and checks= the name and compares to the rc script name. I am not exactly which package is at fault here, as it might be more of a problem with salt and the logic is uses, than with policyd-weight. The problem was with a state such as: mail/postfix-policyd-weight: pkg: - installed service: - name: policyd-weight - running - enable: True Salt is able to start this service, but it never modifies the rc.conf and it doesn't understand the convention used, thus it would fail a restart of the host/jail this state is applied to unless a salt highstate is run to correct the issue. While I can work around this with salt by manually editing the rc.conf, I wonder if this bug needs to be revisited? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-221149-13>