From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 30 13:51:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904AE194 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA2A93C2C for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44387 invoked by uid 89); 30 Dec 2014 13:51:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.66) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 30 Dec 2014 13:51:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:51:43 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Jason Bacon Subject: Re: svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast Message-ID: <20141230145143.689a33eb@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <54A2A7EA.6020607@tds.net> References: <201410062016.s96KGZP8084850@svn.freebsd.org> <86r3vjg054.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A04955.3010601@marino.st> <86387zfur3.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A05AB7.3020200@marino.st> <86sifzef1i.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A05E8E.20802@marino.st> <0E188BDF-EBCD-4849-B329-C7109A52BD33@freebsd.org> <86oaqle7yu.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A2A7EA.6020607@tds.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , "marino@freebsd.org" , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:51:47 -0000 On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:26:02 -0600 Jason Bacon wrote: > On 12/30/14 04:40, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > > Michael Gmelin writes: > >> I don't really follow the argument of bumping portepoch (it's not a > >> very explicit way of stating that this is not the original version > >> - IMHO it's actually not what portepoch is about). > > I never asked anyone to bump PORTEPOCH. I merely pointed out that > > if the ncbi-blast name were to be used for BLAST, PORTEPOCH would > > have to be bumped due to PORTVERSION regressing from 2.2.30 to > > 2.2.26. > > > > DES >=20 > A valid point. Not likely to happen, since the only other candidate > for the name ncbi-blast already exists as ncbi-toolkit. >=20 > Still, I would not be averse to renaming it just for clarity. I > would suggest "ncbi-blast+". I don't know if there are any taboos > about using a '+' in a port name, but there are currently 64 ports > that do it and I like to keep things short and sweet. >=20 > Now would be the time to do this, since it's still new and not yet a=20 > dependency for any other ports. >=20 I would prefer ncbi-blast-plus, but I cannot find anything forbidding nci-blast+ in the handbook, so I would be fine with that (it's not very specific on this topic): https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html Is there a preferred way of renaming a port? Otherwise I would just rmport it and re-add it under the new name. Michael --=20 Michael Gmelin