From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Oct 19 10: 8:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from knightrider.multi.fi (b-133.dial.multi.fi [194.234.152.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484E337B4CF for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from duck@localhost) by knightrider.multi.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA03595 for freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:08:54 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from duck@multi.fi) X-Authentication-Warning: knightrider.multi.fi: duck set sender to duck@multi.fi using -f Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:08:54 +0300 From: Staffan Thomen To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <20001019200854.A3583@multi.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 08:46:07AM -0700, Craig Burgess wrote: > #uname -a > #FreeBSD Felix 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #4: Wed Aug 23 23:17:04 > PDT 2000 > > #EB164 > #Digital AlphaPC 164 > > FWIW, my experience -- with this machine -- is completely positive. > > craig > > Kris Kirby wrote: > > > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > > > ----- > > Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > > | > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." I seem to have lost parts of this thread somewhere, but I have one of those too, it works very well running 4.1-20000719-RC at the moment, standing in my closet, running at 500MHz, not really super fast, but quite solid, it has never crashed. staffan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message