From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 15:06:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13FF16A41F; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:06:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68C443D46; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:06:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j7IF6Quk016940; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:06:27 +0300 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7IF6QOF024634; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:06:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IF6QMC024630; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:06:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:06:26 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20050818150626.GA19494@flame.pc> References: <200508181304.j7ID4DpS030624@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050818143455.GD660@gothic.blackend.org> <20050818145137.GA12148@flame.pc> <20050818150026.GB990@unixpages.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050818150026.GB990@unixpages.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Marc Fonvieille , cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 umodem.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:06:29 -0000 On 2005-08-18 17:00, Christian Brueffer wrote: > I agree with Marc. One of the purposes of the hardware listings is that > they can be used to buy specific supported hardware. I doubt that the > entry you added would be printed on the packing of a modem :-) Seems reasonable. I changed the description to the one suggested by Marc. Thanks guys :)