From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 09:30:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31431065670; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2128FC19; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3F9UTqC055311; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:30:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3F9UTpe002607; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:30:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3F9UTEf002606; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:30:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:30:29 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Yuri Message-ID: <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org> <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="38uh/aik6W4+24mM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:30:50 -0000 --38uh/aik6W4+24mM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote: > >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch > >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. >=20 > bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive,= =20 > and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project.= =20 > They suggest to fork. > So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new,= =20 > will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release? > I will also update pstack port so that it will become current. It seems that the license is two-clause BSD. My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base. --38uh/aik6W4+24mM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+KlTUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gzsQCeJZ4/mFW9Ahcsez0xXslnNYtD GhsAn2sa6oQ5/BENMEvmQFOiW9nwUoZK =f/zU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --38uh/aik6W4+24mM--