From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 21:00:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C099D106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BCA8FC19 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0NL0SM7035082 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0NL0SIF035081; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 GMT Message-Id: <201201232100.q0NL0SIF035081@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: "K. Macy" Cc: Subject: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "K. Macy" List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:00:28 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/146792; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "K. Macy" To: niko@gtelecom.ru Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:09 +0100 Have you tested this workload with 9.0 with the flowtable enabled? Is the problem as severe? Thanks