Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:16:43 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        John Milford <jwm@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Filesystem size limit?
Message-ID:  <20000215191643.A27699@orion.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200002160227.SAA13218@soda.csua.Berkeley.edu>; from jwm@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 06:27:03PM -0800
References:  <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> <200002160227.SAA13218@soda.csua.Berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 06:27:03PM -0800, John Milford wrote:
> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>  wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:24:30AM -0800, John Milford wrote:
> > >
> > > 	Is there any real interest in moving beyond 1TB?  I think that
> > > it would incur a non-trival overhead as I believe that unsigned ints
> > > would not work and we would be looking at going to 64 bit values.  Or
> > > I guess something could be done to simulate larger sectors, but that
> > > is pure speculation.
> >
> > There should be.  The digital library people are talking about tens of
> > petabytes per site and that's probably just the beginning.  I think
> > they ordered a petabyte scale array earlier this year.  Obviously we'd
> > like FreeBSD to be able to play with those. ;-)
> 
> 	Ok, what I was getting at is that 1TB is a very large
> single filesystem, but I can understand as time goes by this will
> become more important.   If it is omething that will really help
> peolple I would be willing to try to do something to fix it, but
> if these types of filesystems are not within reach now, then it
> may be a better use of effort to wait on this issue.

Joe seem to want one.  This size is certaintly within the reach of an
ISP now, and disks just keep getting bigger.  My administrative bias is
that partitioning for a reason other then policy should be avoided and
thus I'd love to see filesystem size support keep ahead of volume sizes
where possiable.  That said, unless someone gives me a very substantial
amount of money to build a cluster at work, I'm not going to be building
any TB file systems for a few more years.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000215191643.A27699>