From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 22 15:38:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71E21561F for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:38:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (monica.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.7.2]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA81150 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199907222237.SAA81150@cs.rpi.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: mbuf leakage in NFSv3 writes, possbile? Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:12 -0400 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have 2 NFS servers. One is primarily read-only, the other read-write, they service the same clients (the read-only services more). They are (were) of the same build. I have a problem on the read/write server where it chews through mbuf clusters (it goes through about 3k in a day). Especially late at night the machine is not busy. And now it is also not busy, yet every minute or so it goes through a few mbuf clusters. The rate is about 108 minutes for 300 clusters. Does it sound reasonable that there is a mbuf leak in the NFS code somewhere? -- David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message