From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 19:10:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B49016A407; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4AA43D46; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8TJARX1078248; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:10:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8TJARND008225; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:10:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8TJAQbc008224; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:10:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:10:26 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20060929191026.GA8206@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <451D4787.4050309@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <451D4787.4050309@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:10:34 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Scott Long wrote.. > John Baldwin wrote: > >On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:43, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>Eric Anderson wrote: > >> > >>>I noticed that cd9660 file system is in sys/isofs/cd9660 instead of what > >>>seems more logical: sys/fs/cd9660. Is there any reason not to move it? > >>> Curious mostly.. > >>> > >>>Eric > >>> > >>> > >> > >>Inertia, mostly. And if you move cd9660, do you also move ufs? Let the > >>bi-yearly debate begin..... > >> > >>Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up > >>fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, > >>so thanks for giving it a kickstart. > > > > > >We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > >Only cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs > >and ufs alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the > >extra isofs directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. > > > > What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And > don't forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the > smell of fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. Now where is that Wagner MP3 again.. ?? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org