From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 22 11: 6:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AF137B401 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 11:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0702243E4A for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 11:06:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8MI6E4v061781; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:06:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Julian Elischer Cc: Erik Greenwald , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: netns In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:49:23 PDT." Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: <61780.1032717974@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Ju lian Elischer writes: > >I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware >connectivity. >I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move >up to 5.x. Well, they'd better get somebody to fix it then because if it doesn't at least show a credible display of functionality when 5.0-R rolls around I'll lobby hard for axing it. If you know there are people using it, tell them this is the time to fix it if they want it to be in 5.0 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message