From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 19 23:59:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alexander.diva.nl (alexander.diva.nl [213.136.18.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A801337B40D for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (boland@localhost) by alexander.diva.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5K6xXt55005; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:59:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from boland@alexander.diva.nl) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:59:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Michiel Boland To: John Nielsen Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATA tags bug fix committed to -releng4 In-Reply-To: <019401c217bc$7caba770$0900a8c0@max> Message-ID: <20020620085158.K54942-100000@alexander.diva.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, John Nielsen wrote: [ata tags bug fix committed to -releng4] > > I think it must be committed to RELENG_4_6. Codebase is the same, > > bugfix is clear, usefullness is clear. ;)) > > > I second the motion, although if any other fixes are immediately pending it > would be prudent to commit them to RELENG_4 for a bit of exposure and then > do a single "ata patch" commit to RELENG_4_6. > > JN Excuse me if I'm wrong, but I thought the RELENG_4_6 branch was for cricitcal security fixes only. IMHO merging this fix would set a dangerous precendent. Cheers Michiel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message