From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 5 7:29:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ipt2.iptelecom.net.ua (ipt2.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BB337B627 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 07:29:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@altavista.net) Received: from vega.vega.com (dialup6-16.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.227.80]) by ipt2.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17014; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:30:08 +0300 (EEST) Received: from altavista.net (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA55067; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:28:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@altavista.net) Message-ID: <3912DA73.7D4642CB@altavista.net> Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 17:28:04 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mi@privatelabs.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/18389: PostgreSQL-7 port fails to build package -- wrong PLIST?, etc. References: <200005051339.JAA31671@misha.privatelabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org mi@privatelabs.com wrote: > On 5 May, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > = Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = > = > >Confidential: yes > = > > = > It seems, that a bunch of tcl files are not installed, but > = > are expected by the PLIST.tcl . Also, the port, probably, > = > should not require Tk, since the software builds pgtclsh by > = > default. Tk is usually run-time loadable anyway. > = > = This PR worth almost nothing w/o a patch > > This is no way to treat a problem report. The port needs to be marked as > NO_PACKAGE or some such with a clear explanation, that the problem is > known, and someone is working on it. Sorry if I offended you, but your Description field is highly unclear. In general it is better not only establish a fact that the problem exist but provide possible solution in the form of a patch or verbal explanation as well. > =(as well as your previous ports/18388). > > This was a submission of a NEW port. What kind of patch do you expect?! > The last section offered a nice and clear URL > http://virtual-estates.net/tcltls-port.shar.bz2 > to the compressed shar-ball of the new port. I found it very difficult > to extract shar-balls submitted by myself and other inside the PRs from > the web-form, where many symbols are replaced according to HTML rules (< > -- >, > -- <, etc.), and switched to the practice of passing the > reference instead of the value. OOPS, it was definitely my fault - I had been mislead by the bz2 extension and supposed that this is distfile's URL. Sorry. Anyway using bzip2 for port submission is impractical (at least until your port is less than 2-3MB long ;) since bzip2 is not part of the base system yet. > = Also I'm unclear why this PR should be confidential???? > > Oops, that was a mistake. Poor editing, sorry, -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message