From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 11  7:30:30 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589E537B402
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by iguana.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g2BFTxZ43279;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:29:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:29:59 -0800
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx>
Cc: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org, hitmaster2k@yahoo.com, bts@babbleon.org,
	kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable)
Message-ID: <20020311072959.B43252@iguana.icir.org>
References: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org> <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:26:31PM +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > --- Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote:
> > > As I already asked:
> > > what compile time options were used in the two cases ?
> > > They surely can make a huge difference.
> > > 
> > > 	cheers
> > > 	luigi
> > > 
> > 
> > Could it also be a possibility, that the NetBSD defaults differ from
> > the FreeBSD defaults, I think this could make some difference too. :)
> 
> actually he mentioned in his post that he used the _same_ binary on fbsd
> and netbsd (statically linked, netbsd with fbsd emu layer)

actually later in the same message he mentioned he used a different
binary, and the  "top" output showed two different names.

	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message