From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 17:36:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2250B10656C0 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2C98FC14 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JXgUL-00075X-Jo for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:36:09 +0000 Received: from murdoc.gwi.net ([207.5.142.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:36:09 +0000 Received: from jcoombs by murdoc.gwi.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:36:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Joshua Coombs Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:36:03 -0500 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <1204313564l.249966l.0l@psu.edu> <7E228F3A-DFE0-4071-8694-14A012CC21E1@gothic.net.au> <1204575279l.807074l.0l@psu.edu> <47D1735D.60007@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: murdoc.gwi.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <47D1735D.60007@FreeBSD.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 buildworld error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:36:12 -0000 Jason Evans wrote: >> cc1 was only trying to request 130MB, my datasize is 512MB, why did it >> fail? > > It looks to me like gcc is trying to allocate a single 130MiB object, > but you don't say anything about how much memory is already in use. It > may well be that there are no remaining places in the memory map to > place such a large object. > > Jason The machine is a pretty lightly loaded, but low physical mem box. 64mb ram, 384mb of swap normally, with an additional 2gb of swap to a file added for my buildworld attempt. Mem: 20M Active, 5604K Inact, 27M Wired, 2876K Cache, 14M Buf, 3064K Free Swap: 2432M Total, 21M Used, 2411M Free 15901 root 1 115 0 12640K 11628K RUN 2:22 86.96% cc1 Thats while building tree-ssa-ccp.c. How do I test out your theory? (Short of watching top while doing the build.) Josh C