From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 05:28:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D961106566C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net [68.230.241.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32B58FC13; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120126052822.FEUC3177.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:28:22 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id S5U71i00H1BeFqy025UF9U; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:28:21 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020B.4F20E476.0004,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rk1frxb7xz1If96DASfsw12EAsms7JN1h2rq8gWSRxo= c=1 sm=1 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=aR16PxjQAAAA:8 a=QeFODNfoCOnUuaHRA2QA:9 a=PUoevtZ2I1weR4uCKbcA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0Q5RpDm065612; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:27:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:27:46 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20120125232746.627fe2dd@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120125205727.GP2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120125200433.52d26eba@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kwm@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxcb 1.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:28:28 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:34:20 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier > wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:17:30 +0100 > > Sebastian Chmielewski wrote: > > > >> 2012/1/25 Kostik Belousov > >> > >> > This is a note that updating libxcb from xorg-dev to 1.8 killed > >> > my client-side X. Every client using libxcb hangs on start, > >> > eating 100% CPU in the poll(2) loop. Downgrading to 1.7 fixed > >> > the issue. > >> > > >> > Not much useful, but I hope to get less mail after the notice. > >> > > >> > >> I have the same issue. Rebuilding libxcb, xcb-util didn't help. > > > > I experienced the same roughly a week ago, and reported it on the > > xorg mailing list (xorg@lists.x.org). =A0Reverting to 1.7 was > > absolutely necessary. =A0I considered for a while upgrading every > > port that depended on libxcb, but according to pkg_info, that came > > out to be roughly 750+ packages(!). =A0No thank you. =A0:-) >=20 > pkg_info may list 750+ ports, but that includes both build depends > (which really need to be re-built) and run-time depends which just > link to the .so and don't. Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and use > 'pkg_libchk -o' to get a list of the ports that REALLY need > rebuilding. It's probably only a dozen or less as libxcb is typically > only used by linking to the .so. Thanks! I just *knew* there had to be a way to do that, but it just wasn't coming to me. Much obliged. :-) I'm finding now that the biggest problem I'm having is all these ports that depend on xcb-util, due to the removal of libxcb-{atom,aux,event}.* I'm currently rebuilding a whole slew of things after having sed-replaced all references to these in /usr/local/lib/*.la with libxcb-util. Making progress. :-) --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net