From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 4 11:32:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7212037B401 for ; Sun, 4 May 2003 11:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.romero3000.com (ip-216-46-71-240.dsl.nyc.megapath.net [216.46.71.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00BB43FA3 for ; Sun, 4 May 2003 11:32:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romero3000@mydomain.com) Received: from mail.romero3000.com (localhost.megapath.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.romero3000.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D2054C3DF for ; Sun, 4 May 2003 14:31:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.1.7 (SquirrelMail authenticated user romero3000) by mail.romero3000.com with HTTP; Sun, 4 May 2003 14:31:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3444.192.168.1.7.1052073110.squirrel@mail.romero3000.com> Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 14:31:50 -0400 (EDT) From: romero3000@mydomain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: opinions on Samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 18:32:17 -0000 Is Samba as a viable as a complete replacement for Windows NT filesharing in networks under 100 users. Or is it better suited for situations where there is already a unix server in the network that needs to share files with nt boxes?? I've implemented it a few times in small networks under 50 users as a quick fix but now my company is thinking about pitching it clients as a small business file and print sharing solution. Do you think that's a viable solution???