From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 02:43:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FD616A4B3 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.btinet.net (mail.gnda.com [216.235.160.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5737143F93 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:43:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pmes@btinet.net) Received: (qmail 23396 invoked by uid 59997); 16 Oct 2003 09:43:34 -0000 Received: from pmes@btinet.net by smtp1 by uid 59994 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (uvscan: v4.1.00/v4243. spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:. Processed in 0.439034 secs); 16 Oct 2003 09:43:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO btinet.net) (209.62.224.243) by smtp1.btinet.net with SMTP; 16 Oct 2003 09:43:33 -0000 Message-ID: <3F8E683F.9050200@btinet.net> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:43:27 -0500 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wilko Bulte References: <20031015112920.GA36404@nagual.pp.ru> <20031015132551.GA94612@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20031015132551.GA94612@freebie.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Andrey Chernov cc: doc@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current-owner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:43:56 -0000 At this point in time it's downright irresponsible not to hide our addresses. I've been lurking on this list about a month to get caught up with -current issues. Friday was both the first mail I sent to the list, and the first use of this e-mail address. The only incoming mail was from the FreeBSD lists I subscribed to. However, since that fateful e-mail I have been viciously attacked by spammers posing as Microsoft security updaters. These spams include attachments making them all around 150KB in size. Maybe others of you have seen them? As far as I can tell, these guys are targeting the FreeBSD lists, exploiting them terribly! This list's charter states that spam will be blocked. Please enforce the list charter, with prejudice. It would be best if subscribers could just choose to have their address published or not. I can understand being so dedicated to the cause that you're willing to take on some spam. Non-subscribers addresses should definitely not be published. Sincerely, Pete... Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:29:21PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > I fail to see why this is relevant to -current but OK.. I think that > the opportunity to do this has long since passed. Just type your name > in Google and see what happens.. > > Wilko > > >>Due to increased activity of SPAM harvesters what are our plans to hide >>our addresses from public WWW? I mean all browseable mailing lists, >>FreeBSD site, CVS via WWW, PRs, ports and docs. >> >>As I think, simple form will be enough to stop >>them. >> >>-- >>Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/ > > ---end of quoted text--- >