From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 10:42:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C05106566B; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.jayachandran@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953E28FC16; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so1036281wyg.13 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BKi4nIS89tgI6s7ZjOaii9QAbTxSf0CnWgIqzT0r3Ik=; b=awSLY6Y3I4xyrJqwSsp6JmDdkXFuN34HHp3nv/JBAry3VkUNhCBTczpyrPovW7YHfg T4/GjuTf6ejsNk2EPjsFKKeS/YAdFQchNvfr2aRxX4H+JUEoYuLaBaFzdIIGv2iN3oH6 w4EKNZreQALVK+zAb032xbh70M+rmy0g8lRj4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.8.80 with SMTP id 58mr564877weq.0.1309344124262; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.195 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:42:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:12:04 +0530 Message-ID: From: "Jayachandran C." To: Attilio Rao Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bumping MAXCPU for MIPS configurations X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:42:06 -0000 On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: > [ Please CC me in replies as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list ] > > I'm planning to bump MAXCPU for all the kernel configurations > requiring it, as long as the latest cut of largeSMP changes is > completed. > > Anyway, I'm not really sure what MIPS configurations may benefit from > a larger number of MAXCPU. Probabilly XLP should, for what I've heard, > but I'd like to get a precise mapping between configurations that want > to bump the number and the actual maximum number of CPUs to be > supported. An XLP SoC has 32 cpus (8cores x 4 hw threads per core), and 4 of these can be interconnected to have upto 128 cpus. We have an XLP port running on one chip with 32cpus, but there is interest in trying out 2 chip (64cpus) and 4 chip(128 cpus) configurations, so this is something I want to do when I get access to multi-chip boards for FreeBSD development. Each XLP SoC has built-in memory controllers, network accelerator, PCIe, UARTs, USB etc., so ideally we want to be NUMA aware rather than doing straight SMP across all the chips. But this is an area I have not looked into yet. JC (Netlogic hat on).