From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 11 15:39:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.Surf1.de [194.25.165.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6546337B7E1; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@cichlids.com) Received: from cichlids.com (pC19F544E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [193.159.84.78]) by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24173; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:38:36 +0200 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441A5AC2C; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from alex@localhost) by cichlids.cichlids.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA03036; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:38:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alex) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:38:56 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: John Daniels Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: staroffice install Message-ID: <20000412003856.D343@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mail-Followup-To: John Daniels , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20000411221911.22953.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000411221911.22953.qmail@hotmail.com>; from jmd526@hotmail.com on Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 06:19:11PM -0400 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake John Daniels (jmd526@hotmail.com): > reason why StarOffice ("SO") needs to be installed in a terminal -- the SO > install is apparantly a graphical, X-based, Windowed, user-friendly process. yes, nice, isn't it? > for the package. Alternatively, perhaps the make file should check that it > is running in an Xterminal? I will send an email or PR to the appropriate > person/list. Yes, do so. I think that Martin will be open-minded for suggestions :) > make install). 2) SO told me that icons would be added within KDE. They > were not. Could this be because KDE is running natively and SO is running > under linux emulation? Hmm. _Maybe_, but I don't think so. You should ask that Martin Blapp (the maintainer), too. (I don't use KDE). Alex -- I need a new ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message