From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 07:20:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE095106566B for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C46D8FC16 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2J7K61B089377 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2J7K6fJ089370; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 GMT Message-Id: <201003190720.o2J7K6fJ089370@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: Yoshiaki Kasahara Cc: Subject: Re: kern/144311: massive ICMP storm on lo0 occurs when using pf(4) 'reply-to' X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Yoshiaki Kasahara List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:20:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/144311; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Yoshiaki Kasahara To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/144311: massive ICMP storm on lo0 occurs when using pf(4) 'reply-to' Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:09:18 +0900 (JST) I found a workaround for the problem. The problem won't happen when I removed TSO support from the interface which is used for the default route. About my old server, only msk(4) has TSO support, so the problem only happend when I used msk(4) for the default route. (My original post was a bit confused and incorrect, sorry). I guess there is something wrong with TSO related code (ip_output.c or tcp_output.c ?), but it is too much for me to understand them....