From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 13:18:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF49106564A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from regnauld@x0.dk) Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1308FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABD84CEE58; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([194.28.252.64]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vX7-9NVXCy80; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from macbook.bluepipe.net (macbook.bluepipe.net [195.249.214.179]) (Authenticated sender: relayuser) by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B85D44CEE56; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by macbook.bluepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4F879A63386; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:36 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld To: Daniel Kalchev Message-ID: <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> References: <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> X-Operating-System: Darwin 11.4.0 x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:18:07 -0000 Daniel Kalchev (daniel) writes: > > It will sure be interesting to learn what people avoid to use FreeBSD for. * full virtualization I am using VirtualBox in production with HAST + ZVOLs, but we need something like DRBD's dual master mode to be able to do a teleport of the instance like Ganeti does (http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/) with Linux Getting Xen dom0 and/or KVM would be a major boost as a virtualization platform, in particular with ZFS. * Gluster For very large FSes, nothing beats it, especially now that 3.3 has been released. Mind you, I've been using FreeBSD for about 19 years, so I'm not about to change, but the two items above would go a long way to help FreeBSD grow in the data center space again (what the kids call the cloud :) Cheers, Phil