From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 18 8:26:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (freebsddiary.org.ua [213.186.199.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A0137B402; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.11.6/8.11.4) id g0IGUiJ37695; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:30:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:30:42 +0200 From: Nevermind To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING Message-ID: <20020118163042.GB35506@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20020118151109.GA35506@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Ruslan Ermilov! On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:23:25PM +0200, you wrote: > > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" > > > is now default and recomended setting now. > > > > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break > > during an upgrade. This isn't one of them. > > > I agree. Let's not make UPDATING another relnotes copy. :-) Hm, I agree, please, forgive my clueless :) I posted this because a friend of mine asked me abous maxusers 0 in GENERIC and he was a little bit confused with this. Thank you. -- NEVE-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message