From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 19 00:58:38 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id D42D5106567A; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:58:38 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Message-ID: <20100819005838.GA24811@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201008181153.o7IBrvlo010634@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20100818184746.GA43513@FreeBSD.org>
	<AANLkTinfDgHsyWPFHSg6c=HdOrbAA2qTFrEd-SxQ13P_@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C6C6159.5060800@p6m7g8.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C6C6159.5060800@p6m7g8.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Andrej Zverev <az@FreeBSD.org>,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-Config-Model Makefile distinfo
	pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:58:38 -0000

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:40:25PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 08/18/10 20:13, Andrej Zverev wrote:
> > 2010/8/18 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>:
> >> Please assign RUN_DEPENDS correctly with := (immediate expansion
> >> operator).  Right now it is polluted with `devel/p5-Module-Build' and
> >> extra one of `lang/perl5.10'.  Consider attached patch.  Point the
> >> original submitter to section 5.7.2 of PH.
> > 
> > Wow, didn't know about it. I will read PH for sure (never read it
> > before actually). I thought that I don't need nothing except to check
> > the assembly in the tinderbox and blind faith in PR plus ignoring some
> > smarts guys like you. This will lead me to the hall of fame of the
> > best commiters. Immortality!!!
> 
> We're actually moving away from that.  Fewer then 100 ports use this
> right now.  Whats prefered is to list the BUILD/RUN depends explicitly
> which portlint tells you to do.

I actually indent to fix portlint(1) in that regard.  I do not see we
should avoid doing handy things like bdels to rdeps assignment just
because someone(tm) believes it's too hard for maintainers/committers to
know make(1) well enough.

This is, like, lets simplifay ze lenguidj, bicoz pipl hev hard taym
ridin it.

./danfe