Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:13:35 +1030 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> To: Jeremy Lea <reg@shale.csir.co.za> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@freebsd.org>, garyj@muc.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: all those .la files Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9903070012110.19176-100000@bragg> In-Reply-To: <19990304172534.C85737@shale.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Jeremy Lea wrote: > > That way we only need to fix one broken port instead of dozens, no? :) > > Yes, that was Kris's plan, which I'm beginning to like more and more... > I haven't looked at it yet, but if most ports are using libtool.m4 -> > aclocal.m4 -> configure, then we might be able to get away with > 'patching' via a sed script in bsd.port.mk (as a post-patch target), > rather than patching 20 million configures. Yep, that should work. All the ones I've done seem to have exactly the same format, so could be updated automatically via sed as you suggest. Kris ----- (ASP) Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) announced today that the release of its productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter of 1901. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.10.9903070012110.19176-100000>