From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 8 23:23:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.newgold.net (mail.newgold.net [209.42.222.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE8F737B63B for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 23:23:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmallett@xMach.org) Received: (qmail 23422 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Jul 2001 06:23:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 06:23:32 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 06:23:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Joseph Mallett X-X-Sender: To: Wes Peters Cc: , Jason Evans , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Bill Fenner , Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? In-Reply-To: <3B4936F2.72D7C1C7@softweyr.com> Message-ID: <20010709062257.S22389-100000@Aphex.NewGold.NET> Organization: xMach Core Team [ http://www.xMach.org/ ] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I don't see a problem there. It's not like we're going to hide the source > to FreeBSD from the vim maintainer. OTOH, I don't really think we need > a "better" vi bad enough to lump in vim. The issues deal with the next version of nvi introducing licensing conflicts, and looking for a wholly free alternative so we don't have to work. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message