From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 25 18:34:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2D1065674 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAB88FC34 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id E0C5B78EAE; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:34:36 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from nogrod.nicoelro.net (ALyon-253-1-25-185.w83-205.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.205.152.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3547778E14 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:34:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:34:33 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20080325193433.1d66c6e7@nogrod.nicoelro.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.12.7; i386-unknown-openbsd4.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Use CGI with suExec without vhost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:34:38 -0000 Hello. I use FreeBSD 7 with apache13-modssl. I compiled apache with SuExec support. However, my CGI programs wirtual host are not wrapped by SuExec. I don't want to use a vhost (i have only one application on my apache: Nagios). If I install a CGI program in a vhost with User/Group directive, SuExec works. How could solve this problem? Thanks. - Nicolas