From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 23:56:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E9C16A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:56:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nic-naa.net (nic-naa.net [216.220.241.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A774243D41 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net) Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7OJu3jB000589; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:56:03 GMT (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net) Message-Id: <200408241956.i7OJu3jB000589@nic-naa.net> To: Warren Block In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:49:29 CST." <20040824174250.C6883@wonkity.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:56:03 +0000 From: Eric Brunner-Williams cc: brunner@nic-naa.net cc: Curtis Vaughan cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:56:23 -0000 I think he said he wants to cross the 4.x|5.x boundary as well. I haven't done that for several months, before and after the gcc version cut-over. He may need current guidance on that. FWIW, I'm going to be upgrading a mono-processor to the beta, but I'll be going the jrandom-5.x CD install, then cvsup'ing to the desired tag. Going 4.x to 5.x was memorable. I think that's when I started reading some of the directions. Eric