From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 23:47:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1C9B13DA for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FCB11512; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by iggf3 with SMTP id f3so45909662igg.1; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Rq9Pmb95WPdwrVXQ2wl8guEd8+8F0u8HCkt2APMkbMw=; b=QrphM3bSP/SWqTg6eyp4rrRSl6JC0sUwqiuwbZdr5L8fbziZMR4QivJwIoLjMb8Jaz xOsaGyrI1nnZ/Sj7RBsxbuCtZ2X+dmvb2IRjCyv0HPyvG6hes0M8we2K409MVVM/cs8/ XNtGFuueqrZyFn6v7I4otYn12el6uXsNoCOIqAzyPHAvds645jrwcvU6zDaYhoylsCY+ AVuR92kbuNzZ3nLRfD5qivAfA+22o0We/wxgsmL6EAkmqtuNinzowOfPMTbFOji4gL7L Pd05fiRUiY2MNmQ/XJN6RstC7nHurEOBlb+BzVMkJQ52VtSWXg20cST8Mkqt+/7FfdM4 J5fw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.28.16 with SMTP id x16mr18118852igg.61.1438559272936; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.38.133 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:47:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1177275050.20150802225939@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1177275050.20150802225939@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:47:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it known problem with libnuma / numactl? From: Adrian Chadd To: Lev Serebryakov Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:47:53 -0000 Hi, I haven't yet gotten around to conditionally compiling in the NUMA support (yes it's on my mind, I'm an embedded person too, so I do care about this!) There's unfortunately no NUMA config option - it's all hinged on MAXMEMDOM. The only things that are compiled in unconditionally right now are the syscalls. I'll try to address that next week. As for what you saw - that's odd; I've not seen that before. How are you building things? What are you building? -adrian On 2 August 2015 at 12:59, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello Freebsd-current, > > Buildworld for r286209 failed: > > numactl.o: In function `main': > /data/src/usr.bin/numactl/numactl.c:(.text+0x269): undefined reference to `numa_setaffinity' > /data/src/usr.bin/numactl/numactl.c:(.text+0x33b): undefined reference to `numa_getaffinity' > /data/src/usr.bin/numactl/numactl.c:(.text+0x375): undefined reference to `numa_setaffinity' > > BTW, is here any WITHOUT_XXX to disable numa parts completely? I'm building > very small embedded image with nanobsd. > > -- > Best regards, > Lev mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"