From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 08:31:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5053106564A; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4748FC21; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC4C65C56C; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:32:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4P80rN-pq0YP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B56065C510; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:31:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8J8VwRi024902; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:31:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:31:58 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexey Shuvaev Message-ID: <20080919083158.GA24881@freebsd.org> References: <20080917101013.GA90749@freebsd.org> <20080918211652.GB19958@what-creek.com> <20080919080616.GA44330@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080919080616.GA44330@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: jb@freebsd.org, John Birrell , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtrace status X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:31:58 -0000 On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:16:52PM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:10:13PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > Dtrace was commited 3 months ago and the only things that prevents > > > using it "out of the box" is building kernel with WITH_CTF=1. > > > > > > When is this going to be enabled on default. What is preventing this > > > from happening? > > > > I wonder whether people generally want it enabled by default. > > > I am not sure for -STABLE but enabling it by default on -CURRENT might > be a good idea. yeah, definitely. I believe we want dtrace working out of the box, dont we?