From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:38:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4218C106566B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBC18FC16 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so2585888laa.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ybD9rf2Xlo/2BwzLiIGImaDDFgHiLC46+Br2/LReU5I=; b=RHgydk4NmrNd98tGpk+kJtRZSifZeXzcEHCjHXMkAJHuOrpXNU4DL+z/Iv5gE+fF75 quUm6yZyjaMiSY1myD/TJ2JBQhvz4iGY0X9Tbeo0lW96I1bKb3B9/ufLImYfMptrIlvU yBascX8ZCbwU/j1pyJwdyOs5BEsJwSegireUcbmlHZwlVOCDwq9PFfnXyexb344ATAdK hpB/GHpPvHFOfWX0vW6NGx4pJBGr+YG5Nvbg52f6PDBxQdy1q4eVuVdjeRwGZnjm/YCi Gqav62qJm3KRQkfrEZjM3MR1LjAu59gVoIdsvI8/t3NDnAJH6meQnzKC4j+5xWEfquNf gOug== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.36.34 with SMTP id n2mr2782234lbj.62.1339771136401; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.13.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [174.254.87.98] Received: by 10.114.13.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Brian W." To: Charles Owens X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkV1CdaxzRoW4iua2fZa2TN1O6Zg/ZC0izdPfEhCAkW3CrYPXPlr3VVarnf3BGx6bKn0Cwi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:38:58 -0000 Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64? On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" wrote: > Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to have > occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 . > > Thanks, > > Charles Owens > Great Bay Software, Inc. > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Adrian Chadd" > To: "Charles Owens" > Cc: > Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 > Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am > > > Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree > between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things? > > > > ADrian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >