Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:06:31 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, des@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net Message-ID: <ygeu0kjigeg.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <20050531.084832.20036038.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <ygezmub1t1c.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20050531.075329.118637972.imp@bsdimp.com> <ygevf4zihhz.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20050531.084832.20036038.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:48:32 -0600 (MDT)
>>>>> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> said:
imp> In general, yes. However, I think that only those libraries that use
imp> the affected interfaces in libc need a bump in this case. Maybe we
imp> should look to see which libraries are affected rather than a blind
imp> bump.
No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers
getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped:
RELENG_5 HEAD Need to Bump
libbsnmp 2 2 o
libc 5 6
libfetch 3 3 o
libftpio 5 5 o
libipsec 1 1 o
libkadm5clnt 7 7 o
libkrb5 7 7 o
libpam 2 2
pam_radius o
pam_unix o
libpcap 3 3 o
libroken 7 7 o
libssh 2 2 o
libutil 4 4 o
libwrap 3 3 o
Actually, not all libraries of kerberos and pam stuff refer
getaddrinfo(3). However, it seems shlib major of kerberos and pam
stuff are managed by single major version.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygeu0kjigeg.wl%ume>