From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 28 23:53:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9C337B424; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@[193.193.218.92]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11816; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:53:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8T6rcF50126; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:53:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <39D43C5F.A826CCFE@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:53:19 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Guidelines for new port version variables References: <20000928120548.A89733@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000928172546.A91774@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:19:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The "_0" is implicit..I didnt think the extra spam on the majority of > > packages is needed > > Optionally allowing "_0" would certainly help me remember to deal with > this. If I see it in the Makefile it is *very* easy for me to bump it > (ore reset to 0). Pff, if you want to have a reminder just print on piece of paper in big letters "Divid, please don't forget about PORTREVISION!" and stick it somewhere near your nose. This is much easier than spamming our 4,000 Makefiles with almost unnecessary "PORTREVISION=0" line. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message