Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:53:19 +0300
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Guidelines for new port version variables
Message-ID:  <39D43C5F.A826CCFE@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20000928120548.A89733@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009281415290.66918-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000928172546.A91774@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:19:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > The "_0" is implicit..I didnt think the extra spam on the majority of
> > packages is needed
>
> Optionally allowing "_0" would certainly help me remember to deal with
> this.  If I see it in the Makefile it is *very* easy for me to bump it
> (ore reset to 0).

Pff, if you want to have a reminder just print on piece of paper in big letters
"Divid, please don't forget about PORTREVISION!" and stick it somewhere near
your nose. This is much easier than spamming our 4,000 Makefiles with almost
unnecessary "PORTREVISION=0" line.

-Maxim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39D43C5F.A826CCFE>