From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 23:21:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D05416A41F for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from pipa.profix.cz (ruprt.hosting4u.cz [82.208.25.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED48143D48 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.profix.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB2E4E705; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:21:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.profix.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20148-05; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:21:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gandalf (unknown [80.95.121.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.profix.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27734E704; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:21:17 +0200 (CEST) From: =?US-ASCII?Q?Daniel_Dvorak?= To: "'Sam Leffler'" , Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:21:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 In-Reply-To: <4328961F.3090702@errno.com> Thread-Index: AcW5cmOyjnLNUAKNRU6xmAlnfvYplAL14x5w Message-Id: <20050929232117.B27734E704@pipa.profix.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at profix.cz Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: To compare hostap-client mode and adhoc's mode on Atheros cards. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dandee@volny.cz List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:21:13 -0000 Hello all, who use wireless stuff of FreeBSD and others. :) Have you tested and compared the infrastructure mode and the adhoc mode anybody ? We have 2 servers with 681 m distance. Wireless signal is about avg. RSSI 20-22 on both site. We use on one site hostap and on the second site client, of course. Rate is a sample rate. The maximum bandwidth is about 1,2 MB/s in one direction. Problem: If we switch cards to adhoc mode on both site the speed is 10 times slower. Nothing else has changed. Has anybody come accross with it in the past or nowadays ? Thank you for your attention. Dan P.S.: Of cource, I could provide more information if it is needed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sam Leffler Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:29 PM To: dandee@volny.cz Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev.ath.0.slottime changing and why ? ath_rate_sample is the only one to use. It's still got some issues (John did some fixes that are in the Linux version that I haven't backported yet) but outperfoms the others hands down. Sam _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____ avast! Antivirus : Odchozi zprava cista. Virova databaze (VPS): 0539-2, 29.09.2005 Testovano: 30.9.2005 1:21:09 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.