From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 7 12:20:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E23937B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FE543E31; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:20:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020707192021.XLAU29588.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:20:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA24457; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Murray Stokely Cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: 5.0 DP2 (was Re: KSE M-III status & junior hacker project.) In-Reply-To: <20020707020339.F11035@freebsdmall.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hopefully some of the new work that will be done on kse can be done on the mainline now without breaking nonKSE activities.. in other words, most of the real "it breaks current behaviour" changes have been passed for a while so new code can be off in "if (KSE_mode) { }" clauses that will have no effect on normal usage. I think that as far as KSE is concerned, you could branch pretty much any time now.. If there turn out to be problems that we fix they can always be merged over later. On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed > > the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that > > have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding > > problem that I know of which is a problem that Warner has with a > > particular progam. (This may also be fixed but I don't know) > > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for your progress on KSE! How long should we wait before > branching in Perforce for 5.0 DP2? I would like to give at least 10 > more days for this and other changes to settle before making the > branch. If all goes well, I would like to release 5.0 DP2 at the end > of this month. > > - Murray > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message