From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 18 23:44:52 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA01972 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 Mar 1995 23:44:52 -0800 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA01966; Sat, 18 Mar 1995 23:44:49 -0800 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id XAA22721; Sat, 18 Mar 1995 23:43:13 -0800 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199503190743.XAA22721@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: SVNET Meeting? To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 1995 23:43:13 -0800 (PST) Cc: gibbs@estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU, peter@bonkers.taronga.com, gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199503190502.PAA06701@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Mar 19, 95 03:02:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 692 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >> organization could sell binary distributions of. Even though the > >> GPL is restrictive, FreeBSD differs from NetBSD in distributing > >> GPLd portions of the kernel. > > >Are they linked into the kernel on any of the kernels distributed from > >Freefall? If they are, then that has the effect of putting the kernel > >under GPL. You need to be *very* careful about this. > > "Only" the ahc driver in the GENERIC kernel. Oh shit, this means we should probably not ship the ahc linked into the GENERIC kernel :-(. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD