From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 12:02:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E9B16A46D for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES) Received: from proxypop1.sarenet.es (proxypop1.sarenet.es [194.30.0.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0658D13C458 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (matahari.sarenet.es [192.148.167.18]) by proxypop1.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F1A8A119; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:02:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> References: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Borja Marcos Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:02:09 +0200 To: Olivier Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:02:14 -0000 On 20 Jun 2007, at 13:13, Olivier Mueller wrote: > So if you are already using ZFS in "pre-production", I would be > glad for > a short "go/no go" feedback, thanks :-) I already jumped into the wagon yesterday with a non-critical machine :) So far I'm happy. Not that I've done a lot of tests, just made some make worlds over ZFS filesystems. I installed the June FreeBSD 7 snapshot and cvsupped yesterday. Borja. ---------------- "The thing he realised about the windows was this: because they had been converted into openable windows after they had first been designed to be impregnable, they were, in fact, much less secure than if they had been designed as openable windows in the first place." Douglas Adams, "Mostly Harmless"