From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 15:15:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CFA16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 15:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2814E43D6B for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 15:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AAD37C.dip.t-dialin.net [84.170.211.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393842F464; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.mkbuelow.net [IPv6:::1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4CFGx61002198; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:17:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Message-ID: <4283736B.10805@incubus.de> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:16:59 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050509) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: peter.orlowski@physik.tu-berlin.de References: <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com> <4280C277.4030904@jim-liesl.org> <27C1250C-9BFD-4FA8-876C-09DF5504B058@isncom.com> <4280EE3C.8050505@jim-liesl.org> <20050511095142.GA12629@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <428243EA.9070707@jim-liesl.org> <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6FF22C9F; url=http://www.mkbuelow.net/mkbkeys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:15:48 -0000 Peter Orlowski wrote: >>At this point, I'm thinking that as far as S/W RAID goes in FreeBSD, the >>"R" is pretty meaningless > > Well, "R" does not mean "redundant" but "realtime backup" ;-(. BTW., what is the status of RaidFrame on FreeBSD? I remember some time ago people were working on integrating it into 5.x or so? I have good experience with Raidframe on NetBSD, and less good with vinum on FreeBSD so I'd be delighted if Raidframe could make it into FreeBSD (and work equally well, of course). mkb.