Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:00:09 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ponds!ponds!rivers (Thomas David Rivers) Cc: ponds!lambert.org!terry, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!root.com!dg, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!FreeBSD.org!Hackers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!cet.co.jp!michaelh, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!rivers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!lambert.org!terry Subject: Re: Even more info on daily panics... Message-ID: <199611151800.LAA26436@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199611150139.UAA20669@lakes.water.net> from "Thomas David Rivers" at Nov 14, 96 08:39:12 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > If you look at the BSD4.4-Lite2 code, you will see they cleaned this > > up (using a fix just as kludgy as my one liner) by using kern_lock.c > > functions instead of smearing the lock state. > > Err, umm, I had to be a naysayer - but I've gotten two examples > of the one-liner fix that didn't address my particular problem. > > Granted, I could have messed something up; I'd be happy to retry > it all... You said it was fixed. Then you put in the printf, but removed the unlock, and it (understandably) blew up. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611151800.LAA26436>