From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Wed Nov 8 15:58:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E115CE56F52 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1AA37FB13 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id t139so11856897wmt.1 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:58:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DqaYIpAFrMyxhe4mhO3Ya+2wy+D19IifIG3s8Tk3YfY=; b=mvLqdTl2dg1BS+EJkNRGxl8wEvQyHuuui5Abm7lkJS6sDHITooML4dCEGVsY8kZwPJ 4H96zm0CbpDiAIHAK90DzNxlZ7MKkiHN6xKgzimhEbm94vvWJZswvPq8Q9E5Aknlif18 NeE8Cn6w1EMoSj0U3y6U3o82mCHm0RbXTS88iUtv+da49aKWp1T08mp1EXAmu7oCTVLb Gs+rFL/3lKL9h5+y+Y0B2im823u61O9nXTRY4ElFPyp2y8wRq4tKWqi3H75j4z9jIYTu JGBL+u0nGkPu0QRKLw6ek4oznMBfrx3hd8oHhykjMrGgPFhnowYhDFiGFlv8rKwwzoox zyPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7bHQFD4vC6ewds10EKuB2+6Reu3+OSvcTlL7GpDfwMKopwNY68 7v5n1hhJMKPQ311jvXpmT3qJ4IZRFAvr2bjPWqs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+S5D4oK1lJoheIw5+Eebb4P+Q/6pUmt3aOovjDpw4K3qTZqm8le2+Wp+wARMfD729B0qpgrDJ07VNUxlNn2nVc= X-Received: by 10.28.35.9 with SMTP id j9mr707559wmj.109.1510156700679; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:58:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:58:10 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cpow and clog To: Dima Pasechnik , sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: Eitan Adler , "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:58:29 -0000 On 2017=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=888=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=89 at 23:03 Steve Kar= gl wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickl= y, > > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree = it > > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision > > control system. > > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. > > The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. > The patch was created under the officical revision control > system used by FreeBSD. We also have an official patch review system: https://reviews.freebsd.org , which is not perfect, but still useable. This might help Dima's concern. Li-Wen --=20 Li-Wen Hsu https://lwhsu.org