From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 5 14:18:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA08652 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br (root@cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.2.31]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA08644 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 14:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA00384 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:17:26 -0300 (EST) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199610052117.SAA00384@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: MFS stable enough ? (2.1.0-RELEASE) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 18:17:26 -0300 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL14 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I was trying to mount /tmp on a MFS partition, but since then my machine crashes when I try to edit (vi) some files. Is MFS stable enough for a production machine ? Are there plans for unification of MFS and the VM system ? Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) jonny@cisi.coppe.ufrj.br Network Manager UFRJ/COPPE/CISI Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro