From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 11 19:29:27 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF9316A494;
	Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDD243EEF;
	Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:28:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id kABJRwWH000566; 
	Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:27:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:27:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061112032442.04c4d246.nork@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611111427400.7251@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <20061110151247.GA64530@zone3000.net>
	<20061111022044.8191e1c8.nork@FreeBSD.org>
	<20061111065629.GA82094@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20061111235332.89f24170.nork@FreeBSD.org>
	<86lkmivws6.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0611111224560.6747@sea.ntplx.net>
	<20061112032442.04c4d246.nork@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]);
	Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:27:58 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-2022-JP?B?U21fX3JncmF2?= <des@des.no>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: libpthread vs libthr.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:29:27 -0000

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:33:37 -0500 (EST)
> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> world.  Then rebuild your ports.  After that, all your ports will
>> reference symbols in FBSD_1_0, and if libthr doesn't provide
>> sched_yield@FBSD_1_0, it'll find it in libc.
>
> 	By the way, can gdm resolve sched_yield@FBSD_1_0 instead of
> 	sched_yield@LIBTHREAD_1.0?  I don't think so.  Is there a
> 	symbol resolving fallback mechanism which I don't know?

See previous email.  You have to rebuild all your ports.

-- 
DE