From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 13 19:10:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA06963 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 19:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov (gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA06954 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 19:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emu.fsl.noaa.gov (kelly@emu.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.60.32]) by gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA13704; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 02:10:13 GMT Message-Id: <199609140210.CAA13704@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov> Received: by emu.fsl.noaa.gov (1.40.112.4/16.2) id AA132777026; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:10:26 -0600 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:10:26 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: hmmm@alaska.net Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <323A5BF3.25BB@alaska.net> (message from hmmm on Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:17:07 -0700) Subject: Re: . File Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> hmmm writes: > i HAVE to do a ". /completePath/to/File" for it to function. > am i really stuck? why do references to my PATH var get lost when > specifying ". File" Because the PATH variable specifies where programs may be found for execution. When you do ". ", you're *not* executing a program; you're telling the currently running shell to read commands from some . Why do you need to do this anyway? Chances are there's something else wrong in the whole process that's making such a thing necessary when it shouldn't be. Tell us, and we'll help! --k