Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Nov 1996 12:51:43 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To:        Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley216.res.iastate.edu>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Write-back boot blocks?  Why not...
Message-ID:  <32839D5F.794BDF32@whistle.com>
References:  <199611081241.GAA00324@friley216.res.iastate.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Csanady wrote:
> 
> I recently came upon an IDE drive, so I have been poking around at
> things to get it to boot off my scsi.  I must say, Im sure there are
> plenty of new, users that get fairly disgusted trying to this to work. :(
> 
> Anyway, does the NAMEBLOCK_WRITEBACK feature of biosboot work?  (documented
> in /sys/i386/boot/biosboot/Makefile)  I noticed it was commented out.  I
> think it would be a really nice feature for 2.2 if it worked.  If not, perhaps
> the BOOT_HD_BIAS variable should be mentioned in the handbook or somewhere
> else obvious. :)
> 
> Just thought I'd bring it to everyones attention..


WE (whistle Communications) use the NAMEBLOCK_WRITEBACK
feature in our product. it allows us to make a turn-key
box that can boot to an alternate root
partition if the first one has screwed up....
(actually that's why we wrote it )
the version in -current is not quite correct.
you need to check out boot.c with tag JULIAN_HACK
to get the version that works corrently.

julian (E)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32839D5F.794BDF32>