From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 13 08:37:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA22321 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sys4.cambridge.uk.psi.net (sys4.cambridge.uk.psi.net [154.32.106.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA22316 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:37:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nadt.org.uk by sys4.cambridge.uk.psi.net (8.7.5/SMI-5.5-UKPSINet) id PAA27029; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 15:46:01 GMT Received: from infodev.nadt.org.uk (infodev.nadt.org.uk [194.155.224.205]) by charlie.nadt.org.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA00343 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 14:24:55 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 14:24:55 GMT Posted-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 14:24:55 GMT Message-Id: <199702131424.OAA00343@charlie.nadt.org.uk> X-Website: http://www.innotts.co.uk/~nadt X-Sender: robmel@wrcmail X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@freebsd.org From: Robin Melville Subject: ATM Frame Relay vs P2P? Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does anyone have any thoughts/experience of the benefits or otherwise of hooking to backbone via ATM Frame Relay as opposed to Point to Point? Any contributions greatly received. Thankx. Rob. -------------------------------------------------------- Robin Melville, Addiction & Forensic Information Service Nottingham Alcohol & Drug Team (Extn. 49178) Vox: +44 (0)115 952 9478 Fax: +44 (0)115 952 9421 Email: robmel@nadt.org.uk WWW: http://www.innotts.co.uk/nadt/ ---------------------------------------------------------